A Reign of Extraordinary Plutocracy Between 2020-2023 with Unprecedented Global Medical and Social Interventions

When the self appointed global government’s medical arm (World Health Organisation) declared a pandemic on 11 march 2020, signalling governments to lock their citizens down, it spelled financial support for some and job losses for others. By and large, the “others” were Small Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs). It also meant interrupted food and goods supply chains that pushed millions in the developing world into food and energy poverty. According to a UN report, an estimated 250,000 children died of starvation as a consequence of the economic dislocation from lockdowns in South Asia alone. The harm to children was incalculable.

Big Tech companies and their billionaire owners in the US, on the other hand,  increased their wealth by  62%, accumulating $1.8 trillion in wealth. Similarly governments pushed a one sided solution involving a new medical intervention that left a trail of harm in its way, enriching Big Pharma and their stakeholders. Established medical protocols were either demonised or gaslighted by official medical authorities.

In regard education, children were denied face to face teaching; schools that were not geared up for the digital world, moreover children from the poorer demographics, fell behind; apparently SARS-CoV-2 contaminated school desks and PCs but not Amazon and Post Office parcels—you will forgive the sarcasm.

UK Government admitted that it downgraded SARS-CoV-2 from a High Communicable Infectious Disease (HCID) 4 days before the command went out to lock the country down. The command went out on a non peer reviewed memo from a computer modeller in the field of epidemiology, Neil Ferguson, who said that half a million UK citizens and 2.2 million citizens in the US would be in peril if their governments did not lock down. His reputation for misdiagnosing the outcomes of epidemics is nothing short of legendary, previously resulting in the mass culling of more than 6 million cows, sheep and pigs.

A report by the John Hopkins Centre for Health Security concluded that the lockdowns – a term that historically has only been applied to prisoners—had damaged societies and made the world poorer.

The same professor with an interest in computer simulation for the spread of diseases, Neil Ferguson, who had advised the UK and US governments to lock down, triggering the trend for almost the entire world, then began advising the government on social distancing policy. Ferguson’s role was authorised to advise the government due to being a member of two government focus groups: Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG).

Ferguson ended up breaking his own rules when he was involved in a tryst with his neighbour’s wife. Following this scandal, Ferguson was said to have stepped down from advising the government on Covid-protocol. It was revealed some months later however,  that he continued to attend meetings on Nervtag and SPI-M, the subsidiary of SAGE, despite Number 10 saying he had stepped back from both. In May 2020, Ferguson continued to attend meetings on Nervtag, and appeared on minutes of a meeting over the summer, as reported in the Daily Mirror, 21 December 2020.

Among the ranking members of SAGE, SPI-M and NERVTAG were a vocal team of social scientists, feeding data to the Government’s departments specialising in behavioural psychology. Their document, which is freely available on the UK Government website, and reported on UK Column News of 11th May 2020, states  the following:

A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.

And:

The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.

This tendency to, ‘do as I say, rather than as I do,’ would become the meme among those who ruled over UK citizens during this regime, not least the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock,  who after criticising  Ferguson’s mea culpa went on to catch the ‘tryst disease’, having an affair with a top aide, and filmed doing it. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnston and his cabinet who were found to have broken lockdown social distancing rules on no less than 12 occasions, with fines issued by the Metropolitan Police on at least 8 occasions (Independent, 19 May 2022.) This was at a time when ordinary citizens were being fined thousands of pounds for breaking lockdown rules, denied attending funerals or visiting dying loved ones in hospitals or relatives in care homes. This would ultimately lead to the PM stepping down from duty, but he wasted no time in catching a flight to Kiev to advise the Ukraine president not to sign a peace agreement with Russia. This emerged during the interview with Professor John Mearsheimer on Lex Fridman’s podcast, 18 November 2023, in which the professor cited the source: former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett.

After the UK Government had taken the lockdown as far as could, Neil Ferguson was forced to admit, the only country that did not follow the WHO-directed policy had faired much better than those that did lockdown, as that country achieved the lowest mortalities with their economy bearing a much softer landing —Sweden: did not enforce social distancing, nor deny children face to face education, nor shut down industry, but shielded the vulnerable. By early July 2020, Sweden had not suffered the 82,000 deaths predicted by computer modelling, but 5,455—less than 7 percent of what was predicted. According to the Cato Institute, Sweden suffered the lowest excess deaths in Europe between 2020–2022.

There were several other abuses in the manner which the pandemic was managed. Not only was the defintion of a pandemic downgraded by the WHO to countenance a viral outbreak across few countries, with few deaths, as opposed to many deaths across many countries, but the entire strategy was not evidence based. It was centred on computer modelling, worst case scenarios. Thirdly, the legal framework was rushed through parliament as an enabling act. Medieval historian and former UK Supreme Court Judge, Lord Jonathon Sumption, described the abusive effects of three statutory acts, including the Coronavirus Act (2020), to let the government rule by decree:

“The British state has exercised coercive powers over citizens on a scale never before previously attempted. It’s taken effective legal control, enforced by the police over the personal lives of the entire population, where they could go, who they could meet, what they could do even in their own homes. For 3 months it has placed everyone under house arrest, qualified only to do a limited number of things approved by ministers. All of this has been authorised by ministerial decree with minimal parliamentary involvement. It has been the most significant interference in personal freedom in the history of our country. We have never sought to do such a thing before, even in war time, and even when faced with health crisis far more serious than this one.”

What about the infections that were broadcast daily from government officials and repeated ad nausium (no pun intended) by the talking heads on TV and Radio. Surely that must count for something? Both UK and US used RT/PCR tests that it’s Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, said should never be used as a diagnostic tool to measure for infectious diseases because the method was notoriously inaccurate. Do you think the Health bodies in UK and US Hospitals followed the Nobel Prize winner’s advice? Not only did they flout it, they encouraged doctors and hospital case workers to mark a death as Covid even if pneumonia or the Flu was diagnosed, or if multiple other underlying causes were present, or if they were not sure what had caused death. You might be tempted to think this is crazy and why would the authorities do that?

Medical Policy was arbitrary and politically motivated. For instance, consider the policy on masks. One month into the pandemic, the UK Government – CMO Chris Witty, Health Secretary Matt Hancock, and the behavioural psychologists at SAGE all declared that mask wearing in the community was of little or no use in the public domain. Within 3 months however,  not only was mask-wearing enforced in public spaces, but unconsionably, children were compelled to wear them in school, even though it was known they were least likely to catch or transmit Covid-19.  Similarly, the US Head of NIH, Anthony Fauci, said that for the public to wear a mask would be equivalent to virtue signalling. Then  almost one year later, he advised US citizens to double up masks, saying it was “common sense”. Knowing this contradiction would signal suspicion within the public, the Gates-funded fact checkers on Big Tech quickly scrambled into crisis management to mollify the about face from the most senior advisor to the Trump administration. Yet Fauci must have known the established science on mask-wearing in the community was fraught with diverse health risks.

Scientists have known for decades that prolonged exposure to CO2, such as through wearing masks, is linked to cognitive decline, still births, reduced verbal and motor skills, and testicular dysfunction. The Foegan effect is thought to have played a role in increasing the Covid19 case fatality rate, due to observed increased viral load.

The driver of the pandemic, then, was all based on hysteria around infections  that themselves were the product of dodgy testing. The hyped dangers were then fanned by the UK Government using tactics derived by its behavioural psychologists. Similarly, the CDC in the US played up the severity and admitted they overcounted Covid-19 deaths by 72,000.

Censorship was widespread during this regime. Not only did Joe Public find their comments pulled from the big platforms, such as YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, but so were some medical professionals of renown. Several UK epidemiologists were persecuted by those directing medical policy. And what happened to those who raised concerns about this arbitrary shifting sand of judgements?

Funding of mainstream media, potentially in financial jeopardy, received payouts to sustain those institutions during the lockdown period. The funders had a vested interest to push lockdowns, vaccines and vaccine passports. Do you think the media might have given a balanced view on the pandemic, perhaps taken the side of the Great Barrington Declaration signatories? Most certainly the consensus was, there is a deadly virus out there, which can only be vanquished by following social distancing until a vaccine becomes available. And what about these vaccines?

Interestingly enough, two of the most well known and popular celebrities in the US, talk-show host Joe Rogan and President Donald Trump, allegedly contracted Covid-19. Rogan gained speedy recovery after taking Ivermectin (a drug that was rubbished in US mainstream media as a ‘horse medicine’ even though it won its inventors a Nobel Prize and has saved millions of lives in the developing world from diseases and parasites). Trump, meanwhile, gained speedy recovery after taking Hydroxychloroquine, a drug known to successfully treat many during the first SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2002. After his speedy recovery, Mr Trump informed the media that the US would not need a vaccine to get out of the pandemic. One week later, Trump walked that back and announced Operation Warp Speed. And so, 3 years after the launch of Operation Warp-speed, what do we now know about the vaccines?

Despite early government media marketing campaigns to sell the vaccines as preventing transmission and hospitalisation, it transpires from the trial data, which Pfizer and the CDC attempted to censor for 75 years, that serious side effects like Myocarditis and Pericarditis were known, and in no insignificant numbers.

Covid-19 vaccines are NOT “vaccines”. In the 1980s the patent filings by Pfizer and Moderna were for gene therapy. The Australian Federal Court, furthermore, has ruled that MRNA vaccines are GMO  (Watch the interview between Dr John Campbell and Julian Gillespie below).

The number of fatalities linked to Covid-19 Targeted ‘vaccines’ filed 3/29/2024 on the VAERS website (regulated by the CDC and FDA) was 37,382.

The number of VAERS recorded adverse events (some non serious, some serious, like Myocarditis and Pericarditis) runs into millions. As of 26 April, 2024, the following were reported (refer to VAERS COVID Adverse Events Reports below.)

Both UK and US authorities say that these statistics are not proof of causality, but they refuse to investigate this. At the same time the authorities admit that the only records they use to gauge early alerts when vaccines trigger health issues are VAERS (in the US), Yellow Card (UK) and in Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) .

This is all to say nothing of the abuse of end of life pathway drugs on the elderly, like Midazolam, that whistleblowers testified was being used by hospitals to euthanize patients to boost Covid deaths; or antiviral medication like Remdesivir, known to cause renal failure, or the ventilators that New York Mayor admitted were killing 80% of New Yorkers. I have just touched the tip of this scandal, but you see what I mean. You would have to be coincidence theorist of the highest order, or reality denier, or complicit in the crimes that have been committed during this regime of extraordinary plutocracy between 2020-2023. The truth will come out!