Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, The Occult and Nazi Nexus
Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. (2Corinthians 2:11)
It is noteworthy, reports the Daily Telegraph, that, until recently, members of the Royal Family had no surname. They routinely used first names and the name of their house, which was inherited from their father (Richard the Lionheart was a Plantagenet, Henry VIII was a Tudor, George I was a Hanover). 1
A Channel 4 documentary (Britain’s Real Monarchy, 3 January, 2004), presented by Tony Robinson, cast doubt on the legitimacy of the current Royal house. The programme presented its thesis on the centuries-old claim that Edward IV was illegitimate, born to Cecily, Duchess of York, by an English archer (surnamed Blaybourne by some) while her husband Richard was fighting elsewhere in France. Richard and Cecily were about 100 miles apart during the five-week period when Edward’s conception must have occurred (assuming that the pregnancy went to a normal term).
Later, when Richard IIIs remains were discovered in 2012 in a car park in Leicester, DNA testing proved that those ascending to the British throne since were not related. Why is this significant?
Most “commoners”, as the Royals call them, do not maintain accurate historical documents of their ancestry. Even with access to the Internet, ancestry websites, registry offices and church parish records, the best most of us can hope to go back is 100-200 years. The Royals, on the other hand, are able to trace their lineage back thousands of years. This is made possible by detailed family records kept by organisations appointed by Royal charter, as proof of the so-called divine right to rule and, to other Royal houses, for the purpose intermarriage.
Imagine a Monarchy – owners of castles, mansions, châteaus, fleets of aircraft, yachts chauffeur driven cars, horses and livestock, on enough arable land to cover several countries – living off taxes and yet themselves exempt from taxes. Would a public be so magnanimous towards that Monarchy if they discovered the Royal succession was nothing more than the lineage of a ruling elite, broken by deceitful schemes and plottings?–There are more–sinister implications.
The House of Hanover ended with Queen Victoria, and her descendants took the dynastic name of her husband, Prince Albert, which was also German: Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, a branch of the eminent House of Wettin.
At the behest of King George V, the grandson of Queen Victoria, the Royals changed their name to the Windsors due to anti-German sentiment among the British public in the run up to WWI. Belying the name change, however, was a long history of intimacy between the House of Saxe-Coburg Gotha and the Nazi party. This is well documented.
Jesus–Christ–said, “Every Tree will be known by its fruits… and that no good tree of itself can produce bad fruit and no bad tree can produce good fruit”. Here Christ alludes to the principle that no good person can of him or herself produce evil and no evil person can of him or herself produce good deeds (Luke 6:43-45).
Many Christians can be confused by this juxtaposition – the media image of a dignified, long serving queen, on the one hand, while on the other, the drip-drip of leaks about a monarch trying to keep a dysfunctional family together, of attempts at stymieing growing cynicism of a public having witnessed the death of a princess, in the exact same way she had announced to the public she had received warnings from intelligence of a Royal plot to kill her, enlightened about the monarch’s intimate links with Nazis and their predilection for the occult.
By nature, humans look to the outer appearance of man rather than the heart. We are, by and large, wired to attract a mate that way. The flip side is that when unchecked this propensity leads humanity into all kinds of depravity. Christ was not incarnated that way such that we would esteem his outer appearance (Isaiah 53:2). The message at the heart of the New Testament gospels is that Christ came to offer forgiveness, inspire man to eschew carnality and pursue matters of the heart that lead to eternal life.
All too often, humans receive and accept knowledge unquestioningly for all sorts of reasons, for good or bad. When we are young, we accept information from our seniors, be that in school or university, as we defer to what we understand as truth or high-value knowledge. Sometimes we receive knowledge because of peer pressure to accept certain events, either because we fear reprisals or pejorative slogans that might consign us to unpatriotic labels. This is particularly true where the victors of war get to write their version of events.
To make matters worse, information is often filtered down to us through media presenters we have been weened on for a generation. They wouldn’t lie to us would they? Similarly, if our preferred news media looks professional and presents advice through so called ‘experts’, news is more likely to be swallowed without question. We are likely to connect truth with high budget media, delivered by clean cut people in smart, expensive suits and a long list of credentials after their names.
Zbigniew Bzrezinski, foreign policy advisor to former US Presidents Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter, self-professed creator of Al Qaeda (during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan), founder member of the CFR and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, said something in 1972 we should all be concerned about.
“Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They’ll only be able to parrot the information they’ve been given on the previous night’s news.”
Bzrezinski made these comments following his book “Between Two Ages”, about a kind of evolutionary step in the technetronic era, beyond Huxley’s “Brave New World”. He was admitting that the public had been so controlled by doctored truth, revisionist history and the powers of hidden technology that our thinking (socio-political and philosophical biases) would be dictated by the news media we are weaned on. To this end, the admissions of David Rockefeller amplify this danger, when he addressed a meeting at Bilderberg Conference in Baden Baden, in June, 1991...
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
It is John D. Jr Rockefeller, through his other son Nelson, that not only donated land in New York to help kick start the United Nations, the prototype World Government, but his foundation funded the launch of the World Council of Churches, an organisation many Christians believe was a front to co-opt the Protestant Church in the way the doctrinal errors of the Catholic Church sabotaged its origins. More prima facia evidence accessible at….[WaybackMachine(at www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm)], enough..to..indict Bzrezinski and the Rockefellers for crimes against humanity. But that’s another story.
This principle of the tree and its fruits, as outlined in the parables, then, curries more meaning if we consider it a process towards an outcome rather than the outcome alone. There is nothing in the narrative to suggest that discernment, the capacity to distinguish motive, good or evil, is instantaneous or that the children of the light are excused from doing their own due diligence. Moreover,Jesus said the children of this world were more shrewd than the children of the light, and He commended them for it (Luke 16:8). Again Jesus warned His own disciples,
“Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves” (Matthew 10:16).
What if Lucifer (“The Ruler of this Age”), knowing well that the children of light would be confused by the tactic of concealment, had engineered among his workers a veneer. What if he decided to employ the secret societies, think tanks and focus groups to outwardly promote the work of charities, set the consensus of political thought and cultural and moral values, while inwardly concealing a nefarious agenda? This is exactly how Freemasonry and secret groups like Bilderberg, Skull and Bones, the Royal Institute of International Affairs and its US counterpart, the Council and Foreign Relations, operate. This is why in England, during the nineties, Freemasons were obliged to declare their membership with the Brotherhood if they were at the same time vying to hold office in the public sector. This scrutiny was cast on Freemasonry largely because of revelations from books like The Brotherhood by Stephen Knight and Inside The Brotherhood by Cambridge graduate and author, Martin Short. But while Freemasonry was experiencing a setback, the evil one maintained his agenda through the other furtive groups.
It was Albert Pike, a general in the American Civil War who fought on the side of the South, who wrote a book that is considered even today among Freemasons like the Bible is to Christians. In Morals and Dogma, p102, he writes that Lucifer is God. Yet he also says the identity and nature of the god of Freemasonry must only be revealed to the highest ranking alumni.
“To you, sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say, so that you can repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: the Masonic religion must be, by all of us initiates of the high grades, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”
So what has all this got to do with the late Queen Elizabeth II and the Royal Family? The Queen was a devout Christian, right? She presented the Christmas message every year about the ‘Christ child!’ Others tell us she was a student of the Bible so she must have been!
According to bestselling author and journalist, Stephen Knight, who in the early eighties interviewed many top ranking Freemasons, most on the condition of anonymity, reported that Elizabeth II, for all her apparent piety, was the Grand Patroness of British Freemasonry (The Brotherhood, Granada Books, 1983, p26). From her patronage stems the charter for a Royal Masonic Institution for Boys (clothing and education for the sons of Freemasons), a Royal Masonic Institution for Girls, Royal Masonic Hospital (For Freemasons, their wives and children).
To some this seems incredulous, but Stephen Knight explains that Christianity was widely accepted in English Freemasonry until the early 19th century, when it merged two factions in 1813: the first, a Christian variant termed the ‘Ancients’, and the other, more esoteric in nature, called the ‘Moderns’. From this time, Freemasonry began to take on a more speculative nature, pagan elements were introduced and the invocation of Jesus Christ was dropped in prayers, replaced with the Deist ‘Great Architect Of The Universe’, and prayers ended with ‘so mote it be’ (op.cit, pp.27-28).
In The Brotherhood, Knight sets out the masonic history of the British monarchy. It has long been a tradition among the monarchs to hold the office of Grand Master. Although Prince Philip declined the offer (he has several other skeletons in the family cupboard that will be discussed later), the Queen’s cousin, the Duke of Kent, holds the current office over British Freemasonry.
Jesus Christ hinted more on this type of juxtaposition when he spoke of the parable of the wheat and tares, how the evil one sows the tares among the good seed, the wheat. The inference in the parable is that the two seeds – one producing good plants, representing the sons of God, the other weeds, representing sons of the devil – would sprout up plants that would outwardly look so similar that distinguishing them for separation would prove too onerous for the children of the light; one would be better off leaving the separation to the angels when they come to reap the human harvest at the end of the age (Matthew 13v22-30.)
Jesus again warned of the danger of these emissaries of evil when he spoke of great deceptions being permitted in the Church, through false prophets and teachers, even to deceive the very elect (Matthew 24:24).
If we were to look at a contemporaneous example of this sophistry, we need look no further than the writings of Marxist writer Saul Alinsky, whose manual on tactical politics for destabilising communities has been widely acclaimed by Hilary Clinton, current Democrat party leader for the 2016 US presidential race, and adopted by UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s administration.
“True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties…
(extracts from Rules For Radicals, Saul Linsky, 1971)
David Cameron’s administration coined the initiative “Big Society”, a construct in which the leading force for progress supposedly involves social responsibility, not state control. It includes a whole set of unifying approaches – breaking state monopolies, allowing charities, social enterprises and companies to provide public services, making Government more accountable. On the face of it, it sounds reasonable, that is until one finds out the underlying plans for Big Society are based on Rules For Radials. The Conservative home blogsite admitted,
“This plan is directly based on the successful community organising movement established by Saul Alinsky in the United States and has successfully trained generations of community organisers, including President Obama.”2
Given that one of the aims of revolution viewed by Alinsky was to infiltrate churches, unions and political parties, it comes as no surprise to learn that he
dedicates Rules For Radicals to Lucifer.
Is it possible that Elizabeth II, supposedly a student of the Bible and committed Christian, and her panoply of advisors, are just not aware of this? Phrasing the question another way, is its possible the Lord God has not once in her tenure disclosed to her the dangers besetting her country by the revolutionary ideas of a man who is evidently persuaded by the ideas of Lucifer, the arch enemy of Jesus Christ and His Church? Has God not once said to her, you cannot serve two Gods: Lucifer, the god of Freemasonry, and Me?
Since the Queen lived for nearly 100 years, with the power to dissolve parliaments around the Commonwealth, and held the duty of conferring her blessing on newly elected prime ministers in her own country, with access to intelligence ordinary mortals could only dream of, there was probably more chance of the ordinary man winning the Lottery than ‘Her Majesty’ neither knowing about the incompatibility of Christianity and Freemasonry, nor anything about Saul Alinsky, nor being aware that the leading governments in the West, including her own, were and still are students of him. There is a lot more wrong with the things in this world that Elizabeth was aware of and yet, at best, looked the other way, and, at worst, was complicit in evil.
Let’s look at the Windsor family’s history, for instance.
It is well documented that Prince Philip’s sister, Sophia, was married to Christopher of Hesse-Cassel, an SS colonel who named his eldest son Karl Adolf in Hitler’s honour. Indeed, all four of Philip’s sisters married high-ranking Nazis. The prospect of the former Nazis and Nazi sympathizers attending his 1947 wedding to the future Queen of England meant he was allowed to invite only two guests.
Philip also helped start the World Wildlife Fund with close friend and former Nazi SS Officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who went on to found the elitist Bilderberg Group. Prince Bernhard died in 2004 and was the father of current Queen of The Netherlands, Beatrix, also an attendee of Bilderberg. Beatrix is a 5th cousin of Queen Elizabeth II.
The Bilderberg Meetings are so named because they first met in 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Netherlands. Leaked documents from their meetings reveal that presidents and prime ministers of the West are chosen; political and economic agendas are set for global implementation. Wars are decided as well as which nations should rise or fall (The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, Daniel Estulin, Trineday, 2005).
In the past, Philip has also attended the ultra-secretive ritualistic meeting of elites at Bohemian Grove. This annual Druidic Mid-Summer pagan event is no ordinary jamboree. Like Bilderberg it includes global heads of state, media moguls, military leaders and CEOs of major corporations, from weapons manufacturers to Fortune 500 companies. In film footage secretly captured by an amateur film maker, the revelry involves the mock sacrifice to a 40 ft owl idol called Molech. This is the Canaanite deity to which Adonai commanded the Israelites not to sacrifice their children (Leviticus 18:21).
Borrowing the idea from Rockefeller funded American scientists who pioneered the field in the 1930’s, the Nazis advanced the pseudo-science of eugenics and incorporated it into Adolf Hitler’s dream of the Aryan super-race. Bearing in mind Philip’s Nazi connections, his views on the subject of overpopulation are unsurprising, but shocking nonetheless.
Here are some revealing quotes by the prince (some of the weblinks are now only accessible on the Wayback machine.)
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation”.
From “His Royal Virus”, Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.
“What has been described as the ‘balance of nature’ is simply nature’s system of self-limitation. Fertility and breeding success create the surpluses after allowing for the replacement of the losses. Predation, climatic variation, disease, starvation–and in the case of the inappropriately named Homo sapiens, wars and terrorism–are the principal means by which population numbers are kept under some sort of control”.
From an Introduction to “The Population Factor” section of Down to Earth by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, 1988.
“We Need To ‘Cull’ The Surplus Population“
Printed in The American Almanac, August 25, 1997
“It is curious how many philosophers from Plato to Keynes’ time have believed in and advocated the control of society by “philosopher kings.” According to Plato, “its kings must be those who have shown the greatest ability in philosophy,” but–realistically–he added, “and the greatest aptitude for war.” Such people may exist in the imagination and occasionally someone with the necessary qualities may briefly dominate the stage of history, but it is a naive appreciation of human nature to imagine that such processed paragons can be invested with the necessary powers and not be tempted to take advantage of their situation”.
From “A Question of Balance” by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Michael Russel (Publishing) Ltd., 1982.
There is much more, but that can be explored in another treatise. In conclusion, my thesis maintains that the Royal family of Britain is a sham; that devastating evidence casts Elizabeth and her consort in a light they would not wish the masses knowing, much less committed Christians. Yet the evidence is freely available to any person prepared to do their due diligence, to anyone who has an ear to hear or an eye to see.
References, Credits and Further reading:
The Discovery of Richard II,
University of Leicester, accessed 05 June, 2016.
https://www.le.ac.uk/richardiii/
Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline,
Sarah Knapton, 2December,2014
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/15/richard-iii-dna-shows-british-royal-family-may-not-have-royal-bl/
Why are the royals STILL hiding their German past?: Queen urged to display German uniform worn by her grandfather as Britain headed for war with his cousin The Kaiser
Christopher Wilson, Published: 01:01, 19 July 2014 | Updated: 12:43, 19 July 2014
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2697882/Why-royals-STILL-hiding-German-past-Queen-urged-display-German-uniform-worn-grandfather-Britain-headed-war-cousin-The-Kaiser.html
Prince Philip Quotes:
Prince Philip, In His Own Words: We Need To ‘Cull’ The Surplus Population
Printed in The American Almanac, August 25, 1997.
His Royal Virus
Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/prince.html
Now available..on..the Wayback machine, accessed 28 May, 2024
Bohemian Grove, YouTube.com, film footage by Alex Jones, Film maker, author
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9zshNWK_J4
“Touchy Subject of the Royal Links with Nazi Germany”,
Evening Standard, 13 January 2005.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/touchy-subject-of-royal-links-with-nazi-germany-7190292.html
The Big Society, Our Common Betrayal – Part 1, Martin Edwards, UKColumn, Sunday, 19th June 2011
http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/big-society
David Cameron’s Big Society is a grotesque fantasy inspired by leftist subversive Saul Alinsky, Gerald Warner, Politics April 1st, 2010
http://www.abeldanger.net/2010/07/saul-alinsky-behind-camerons-big.html
extracts from Rules For Radicals, Saul Linsky, 1971
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
Now available..on..the Wayback machine, accessed 28 May, 2024
These Things Must Happen– A Lesson from the Fig Tree,
David Gaffney, Tate Publishing Enterprises, USA, 2011, p197
The Wycliffe Bible Translators, John Mott & Rockefeller Connections
http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm, accessed 1 June, 2016
http://www.illuminati-news.com/0/Rockefeller(part2).htm, accessed 28 May, 2024
Rockefeller and the New World Religion, Daniel Taylor, Old-thinker news, Dec. 2, 2007
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2007/12/02/rockefeller-and-the-new-world-religion/
This link is only available now on the Wayback machine, 28 May, 2024
The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea,
Tim Cohen, Prophecy House, POBOX 461104, Aurora, CO 80046-1104
www.prophecyhouse.org
1(How German is the Queen? Dominic Selwood, 24 Jun 2015)
2 accessed in 2010, now removed but cached in Google search engine
3 Prima vacia evidence
Pingback: War and Geopolitics - Ernest Millington Posts