Quigley was no ordinary man. A professor of Political Science from Georgetown University, he not only mentored William Jefferson Clinton, but he became the official historian to arguably the most  powerful group of oligarchs, bankers, politicians and aristocrats to have emerged since the Knights Templars in the Late Medieval Period, or the Medicis of Renaissance Italy or the Bavarian Illuminati of 18th century Germany.

Clinton served as president of the United States from 1993 to 2001. So influential on Clinton was Quigley that the 42nd president paid tribute to Quigley at his acceptance speech as Democratic presidential nominee to the Democratic National Convention.

Quigley’s 1300 page opus, “Tragedy and Hope”, sets out the history of the world since Cecil Rhodes established a trust and formed a secret society in 1891. The book transitions through WWI, onto how the UK Government was ruled by 4 parties in the lead up to WWII: 2 inner, and 2 outer. 

The 2 inner parties controlled the 2 outer parties by virtue of their political influence, which, in turn, was manufactured  by their financial wealth. Their goal was three-fold: 1) to take government to the English speaking world, 2) recover America under the group’s control following the independence it won during the revolutionary war of 1776, and 3) to concentrate the wealth of the world, using the central banks, into fewer and fewer hands.

The group added to its numbers graduates from Oxford University and Toynbee Hall, who were recruited by Lord Alfred Milner to run his administration. The Milner group, as it was also known, went into influential posts in government and international finance, and became the dominant influence in British imperial and foreign affairs up to 1939. Through Rhodes Trust they were able to establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs at Chatham House in London. RIIA satellites were setup in the chief British dominions, while in the USA, it was called the Council on Foreign Relations. Similar satellites were established in the Pacific, called the Institute of Pacific Relations.

With WWII looming, Quigley termed the 2 controlling parties, 1) “The Anglo American Establishment” and 2) “The anti-Bolsheviks”. Quigley also referred to the Anglo American Establishment as “The Round Table Groups”, or “The International Bankers”, or for brevity, “The Bankers”. The first group, as the name suggests, constituted mostly English and American bankers, and was not unfriendly to Russia, but anti-German. The anti-Bolsheviks, on the other hand, were pro-German and anti-Russian. The relationship between both groups could be complex at times, as some members, like Jan Smuts, the political figure who later figured in South African politics, were members of both parties.

Quigley reported that the bankers used their influence in the Times Newspaper, which they owned through the Astor family, to convince the British Academic class that Germany had been harshly treated for the reparations imposed on them following the League of Nations decision to conclude WWI. The motives of the bankers was to extend a credit line to the Reich-bank so as to permit Hitler rebuild the Rhineland. The bankers wanted to foment another World War in which they desired peace established by bringing together the 3 main forces.  Quigley termed it the “3-bloc world.” The group established that Germany could never beat Britain, since they would have Stalinist Russia on its eastern flank. Similarly they figured that Russia could not prevail against Britain and its American ally since Hitler’s Germany would act as a bulwark. It clearly mattered not to the bankers that the results of their plottings should end in the deaths of 50+million military and civilians.

To the average person, the machinations outlined above might well sound unbelievable since they themselves could never contemplate such skulduggery. Research into psychopathy is the necessary smelling salts to bring the reader into reality. For instance, a study of many of the elites of the late 1700s reveals an obsession with Mathusianism – the pseudoscience that calls for the reduction of population size. Thomas Malthus, an English economist (1766-1834) and the man who lent his name to the ideology, promoted the scare that food supply would be outstripped by population growth. Sound familiar?

Malthius influenced a host of naturalists, including Charles Darwin, and economists like John Meynard Keynes. Continuity in his ideology persists today and crops up in think tanks and focus groups like the Optimum Population Trust, the United Nations, and its affiliates, like the World Economic Forum and World Wildlife Fund. Its doctrine resonates among the great and the good (refer to my artcle “Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Phillip, the Occult and the Nazi Nexus.”) Malthusian pseudoscience is dressed up in the canard of “Climate Science”, but that is a topic warranting a descussion space of its own.

It should be mentioned that the preoccupation with population control found truck with local societies within British and US hierarchy, most notably the Fabian Society in Britain, the group that spawned the Labour Party. One of its founding patrons, playwright George Bernard Shaw, made some provocative statements about population control that should shock everyone to their core. He advocated that  humans should present themselves before a committee every 5-7 years to account for their consumption of resources, whether they consumed more than they produced. He admitted he would like to see them killed if they were greater consumers than producers.

Returning to Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, and his dialectic that the concept of left or right is merely academic, a phantom designed to give ordinary voters the perception of free choice, with the power to “throw the rascals out” and yet without any real change. This tells us the voting systems we have in Britain with the constitutional Monarchy and in America, the Republic, are rigged. They are both nothing more than a duopoly.  For instance, we learned during the Labour Blair era, that both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s role model was former Conservative PM Margaret Thatcher. Similarly, when the Conservatives succeeded the Blair cabinet in 2010 under David Cameron, the Tory PM admitted he modelled his leadership style on Tony Blair. The Daily Mail, a traditionally Tory aligned paper, termed Cameron’s cabinet ‘blue labour’.

In the interview with Whitney Webb, the blogger outlines how both Democrat and Republican parties are funded by Peter Thiel’s Palantir. Webb describes how Palantir was established with CIA money and builds on software developed in the eighties (called Promis). The software was stolen from its company, INSLAW, and emerged in US intelligence use for surveillance of terrorist activities, or anything defined by the state as an ‘enemy.’   Journalist Danny Casolaro was set to blow the back story of Promis wide open, then was murdered. A Netflix series covers Casolaro’s investigation before his murder, but may be viewed on YouTube (below).

By the time 911 happened on the world, another derivative of Promis software had been developed to detect enterprise fraud. Indira Singh was employed by JP Morgan Chase to develop this software. After discovering that a Saudi software company called P-Tech, owned by a tycoon on a terrorist watchlist, had access to the FAA computer security system in the leadup to 911, Singh presented her findings to JP Morgan Chase. She was told, “back off or face the consequences.“

The software US State intelligence apparatus has at its disposal now has been developed to predict crime under the moniker ‘pre-crime.’ * Who said Hollywood blockbusters are all mere science fiction fantasy. Recall the film “Minority Report (2002)?”

* For further analysis on P-Tech and US Intel, access this NSA-PROMIS-PTECH-and-911.